Coming from another thread I'd like to sub-thread that statement.
Why can't Mizzou get 2-3 top 50-75 players every year? Once you remove the one and dones you still have 65 or so players there. Let's call it 65 anyway.
The bluebloods get their usual 3-4 which the top 15-20 fall into. There should be 40 to 50 players still available.
Now let's look at the shitty programs landing these players....Cal, Auburn...Memphis.
When Weber was at SIU he landed 3 or 4 four stars in one class....SI freaking U.
Mark Few built his program from the bottom of the dumpster...he gets to talent and mixes it with transfers (boo transfers, but Few can coach)
Butler was realing them in here and there.
I just don't get statements like these. While currently it may hold water it's still asinine.
If it's not fan support, school support, coaching then what is the hold up?
Why can't Mizzou get 2-3 top 50-75 players every year? Once you remove the one and dones you still have 65 or so players there. Let's call it 65 anyway.
The bluebloods get their usual 3-4 which the top 15-20 fall into. There should be 40 to 50 players still available.
Now let's look at the shitty programs landing these players....Cal, Auburn...Memphis.
When Weber was at SIU he landed 3 or 4 four stars in one class....SI freaking U.
Mark Few built his program from the bottom of the dumpster...he gets to talent and mixes it with transfers (boo transfers, but Few can coach)
Butler was realing them in here and there.
I just don't get statements like these. While currently it may hold water it's still asinine.
If it's not fan support, school support, coaching then what is the hold up?
