@GabeD Mentioned what game segment to take away. The first 34 or the last 6?
I want to ask you to take a look from a different perspective.
What if this was reversed and it was Mizzou who was dominated all day long but make a great comeback but only to fall short?
If the focus is looking at the last six minutes instead of the first 34, would the same thing apply if In this reverse scenario that the way Mizzou came back is more of an indicator of who they are? Or would the focus be about how Alabama dominated and we were lucky to have any chance?
If I am Alabama I have problems.
1). They are actually worse than Mizzou at getting their shot blocked.
2) Mizzou exposed them today. Cuonzo had a solid defensive plan.
Don’t leave the three point shooters. Stay man to man and contest their drives. They missed a ton of contested of shots in the lane and had a bunch blocked or impacted
3) Alabama didn’t have the kick outs to wide open 3s
4) Pound the paint.
5) Alabama better pray they don’t get one of those early tip times in the tournament.
I want to ask you to take a look from a different perspective.
What if this was reversed and it was Mizzou who was dominated all day long but make a great comeback but only to fall short?
If the focus is looking at the last six minutes instead of the first 34, would the same thing apply if In this reverse scenario that the way Mizzou came back is more of an indicator of who they are? Or would the focus be about how Alabama dominated and we were lucky to have any chance?
If I am Alabama I have problems.
1). They are actually worse than Mizzou at getting their shot blocked.
2) Mizzou exposed them today. Cuonzo had a solid defensive plan.
Don’t leave the three point shooters. Stay man to man and contest their drives. They missed a ton of contested of shots in the lane and had a bunch blocked or impacted
3) Alabama didn’t have the kick outs to wide open 3s
4) Pound the paint.
5) Alabama better pray they don’t get one of those early tip times in the tournament.