Peep the first ~3 years and then year 4 and beyond:
en.wikipedia.org
I see some similarities -- a dorment program that had some success but couldn't get over the hump with Bowden, etc.. A "Young" coach comes in that players like and was able to build up the recruiting, athleticism, and strength over time.
Will Mizzou take the same path. Probably not to that wild extent. But even a small correlation to this path would be incredible.
I was on the fence on Drink until this year (like many). You can go back and find plenty of my posts that were iffy at best about it. They're starting to get past some of the foolish stuff that cost them in the past. I'm excited about the trajectory and happy to be wrong.
Dabo Swinney - Wikipedia
I see some similarities -- a dorment program that had some success but couldn't get over the hump with Bowden, etc.. A "Young" coach comes in that players like and was able to build up the recruiting, athleticism, and strength over time.
Will Mizzou take the same path. Probably not to that wild extent. But even a small correlation to this path would be incredible.
I was on the fence on Drink until this year (like many). You can go back and find plenty of my posts that were iffy at best about it. They're starting to get past some of the foolish stuff that cost them in the past. I'm excited about the trajectory and happy to be wrong.
Last edited:
