ADVERTISEMENT

Mizzou QBs - Sophomore Stats Comparison

mizzousa

All-American
Gold Member
Jun 23, 2011
2,893
5,922
66
I think people (including myself) are down on Cook not because of his performance per se; he showed development over the season and by the end became a serviceable P5 QB even with a torn labrum. The problem is, 1) we all know that serviceable isn't enough to take Mizzou where we all want to go, and 2) over the last 20 years, most Mizzou QBs in their sophomore year have been better than Cook (MM is the only one arguably worse – Berk only started as a freshman); in other words, we've been a little bit spoiled.


Sophomore stats

Brad Smith:
194/320 (60.6 %) - 1822 (5.69 YPA), 11 TD / 6 INT, Rush 192 / 1310 yds (6.82 YPA), 17 TD

Chase Daniel:
287/452 (63.5%) - 3527 yds (7.80 YPA), 28 TD / 10 INT, Rush 147 / 379 yds (2.58 YPA), 4 TD

Blaine Gabbert:
262/445 (58.9 %) - 3593 yds (8.07 YPA), 24 TD / 9 INT, Rush 104 / 194 yds (1.87 YPA), 3 TD

James Franklin:
238/376 (63.3%) - 2865 yds (7.62 YPA), 21 TD / 11 INT, Rush 217 / 981 YDS (4.52 YPA), 15 TD

Maty Mauk:
221/414 (53.4%) – 2648 yds (6.39 YPA), 25 TD / 13 INT, Rush 108 / 373 yds (3.45 YPA), 2 TD

Drew Lock:
237/434 (54.6%) – 3399 yds (7.83 YPA), 23 TD / 10 INT, Rush 52 / 123 yds (2.37 YPA), 1 TD

Brady Cook:
247/382 (64.7%) – 2734 yds (7.15), 14 TD / 7 INT, Rush 139 / 585 yds (4.21 YPA), 6 TD
 
Last edited:
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Go Big.
Get Premium.

Join Rivals to access this premium section.

  • Say your piece in exclusive fan communities.
  • Unlock Premium news from the largest network of experts.
  • Dominate with stats, athlete data, Rivals250 rankings, and more.
Log in or subscribe today Go Back