Taking a look at the schemes that Drink is using at Missouri, vs what he did at App State and NC State.
Drink used a lot of inline TE coupled with an H Back at both NCST and App State.
At NCST there was a lot of RB Draws used in 2018
His bread and butter pass play at both schools was a skinny post or a hard 8 post.
Both schools used a ton of counters in the running attack.
At some point he has fallen in love with the outside stretch, wr "pop" pass, and the WR Screen. Ideally all of these are used to run the skinny or hard 8 route, however I cant remember if Drink has used that route in a game. At App State Corey Sutton made an absolute killing on that route.
Its interesting to see what he is capable of calling and you have to wonder why some of these things are not implemented or run as much as they should be.
Its frustrating that he is not utilizing the same TE/H-Back philosophy at Missouri.
In year 3 the playbook should be much more wide open. I can only hope that we see a broader play calling in conference play.
Drink used a lot of inline TE coupled with an H Back at both NCST and App State.
At NCST there was a lot of RB Draws used in 2018
His bread and butter pass play at both schools was a skinny post or a hard 8 post.
Both schools used a ton of counters in the running attack.
At some point he has fallen in love with the outside stretch, wr "pop" pass, and the WR Screen. Ideally all of these are used to run the skinny or hard 8 route, however I cant remember if Drink has used that route in a game. At App State Corey Sutton made an absolute killing on that route.
Its interesting to see what he is capable of calling and you have to wonder why some of these things are not implemented or run as much as they should be.
Its frustrating that he is not utilizing the same TE/H-Back philosophy at Missouri.
In year 3 the playbook should be much more wide open. I can only hope that we see a broader play calling in conference play.
