Should a federal judge be relieved of his duties if he’s unable to interpret historical legal analogues to modern law?
This is the job of a federal judge and his many clerks, yes? I understand liberal activist judges have been painted into a corner by Justice Thomas’ brilliant majority opinion in NYSRPA v Bruen. He closed all the loopholes and corrected every District and Circuit Court 2A interpretation error of the past decade. However, delaying or denying justice due to feigned ignorance isn’t an option. You can either do the job or you cannot do the job.
My second question here is why did this judge ask the case’s involved parties to opine on his ignorance, one of which is the partisan USDoJ. Instead, shouldn’t the hierarchy of federal Court governance have routed him to SCOTUS Justice Samuel Alito for guidance on how he should handle this procedural aspect of his work? Oh, maybe I just answered my own question there.
www.cnn.com
Knowing not everyone will be terribly interested in this nerd topic, I’ll tag a few of our OT attorneys and 2A advocates.
@lawgeek @christiger @cmeier76 @Mosnowman @Dean MacBaine @Mizzoubballfan2 @Baud Dude @Baseball_Dewd @MelWest @S_W_M_O @Mizzou Mule @mUt1g3r @MizzouCard @87Tiger14 @mizzoucobra @seventhchildfifthson @ABaumli @MUSECTiger23 @dreamlaw @QuinnSnydersPizzaGuy @MizTarney
This is the job of a federal judge and his many clerks, yes? I understand liberal activist judges have been painted into a corner by Justice Thomas’ brilliant majority opinion in NYSRPA v Bruen. He closed all the loopholes and corrected every District and Circuit Court 2A interpretation error of the past decade. However, delaying or denying justice due to feigned ignorance isn’t an option. You can either do the job or you cannot do the job.
My second question here is why did this judge ask the case’s involved parties to opine on his ignorance, one of which is the partisan USDoJ. Instead, shouldn’t the hierarchy of federal Court governance have routed him to SCOTUS Justice Samuel Alito for guidance on how he should handle this procedural aspect of his work? Oh, maybe I just answered my own question there.
Federal judge blasts the Supreme Court for its Second Amendment opinion | CNN Politics
A federal judge based in Mississippi has released a scorching order expressing frustration with the Supreme Court's Second Amendment opinion issued last summer and ordered the Justice Department to brief him on whether he needs to appoint an historian to help him decipher the landmark opinion.
Knowing not everyone will be terribly interested in this nerd topic, I’ll tag a few of our OT attorneys and 2A advocates.
@lawgeek @christiger @cmeier76 @Mosnowman @Dean MacBaine @Mizzoubballfan2 @Baud Dude @Baseball_Dewd @MelWest @S_W_M_O @Mizzou Mule @mUt1g3r @MizzouCard @87Tiger14 @mizzoucobra @seventhchildfifthson @ABaumli @MUSECTiger23 @dreamlaw @QuinnSnydersPizzaGuy @MizTarney
