Obviously either one would be light years better than what appears currently. But which development system would work better in the SEC. Obviously Pinkel's system worked extremely well two years then decayed with lack of recruiting success. Wazzu would more closely resemble it. But why isnt the Wisconsin system more successful at Arky with Beilema? You would think a run first offensive scheme with developmental athletes on the Oline would thrive in the SEC. It would make the defense's job easier, chew up clock and would fit our current ability to land recruits. We almost have the worst hybrid of it on offense with a slow fat Oline, throwing the ball most plays, and running 100 plays a game. And our defense is a sieve. Yet it seems like this team would win more games this year running a Wisconsin style gameplan. It's honestly what I thought Odom would run in the beginning.