Democrats complain about dead people voting in California

[CTG-Tiger]

Amazing. They figured out what we’ve been saying. Finally

Signatures of hundreds of dead people were found in D.A. Gascón recall petition

Los Angeles County's registrar-recorder/county clerk has asked the California attorney general to launch an investigation into the petition to recall Dist. Atty. George Gascón after it found 364 signatures that belonged to dead people.

www.latimes.com

 

[TigerfaninChi]

Amazing. They figured out what we’ve been saying. Finally

Signatures of hundreds of dead people were found in D.A. Gascón recall petition

Los Angeles County's registrar-recorder/county clerk has asked the California attorney general to launch an investigation into the petition to recall Dist. Atty. George Gascón after it found 364 signatures that belonged to dead people.

www.latimes.com

Uhhh, these are petition signatures, not votes. But carry on……

 

[CTG-Tiger]

Uhhh, these are petition signatures, not votes. But carry on……

For some reason you guys don’t like dead people signing petitions, but have no problem with them voting

 

[MUTiger91]

For some reason you guys don’t like dead people signing petitions, but have no problem with them voting

I would be a lot more outraged if you could actually provide PROOF. You always seem to skip that part and go straight to the accusation. I await your breathless arrival with proof of one person voting his dead wife's mail-in ballot for Trump as your PROOF of widespread Democrat election fraud.

 

[CTG-Tiger]

I would be a lot more outraged if you could actually provide PROOF. You always seem to skip that part and go straight to the accusation. I await your breathless arrival with proof of one person voting his dead wife's mail-in ballot for Trump as your PROOF of widespread Democrat election fraud.

Well the outcome in the petition situation was against the interests of the political establishment in California, so they looked for fraud and found it. We should assume that they would find a similar amount of, for example, signature mismatches on mail in ballots that they found on petitions, since the security around both events are roughly the same, if they bothered to look for fraud on ballots. The difference is that they didn't look for fraud on the ballots, just the petitions. It's just as easy for dead people to vote as it is for them to sign petitions. Signatures are just as likely to be mismatched on ballots as they are on petitions.

If signature mismatches aren't in the 2% range, you should assume the signature match is not credible.

 

[MUTiger91]

Well the outcome in the petition situation was against the interests of the political establishment in California, so they looked for fraud and found it. We should assume that they would find a similar amount of, for example, signature mismatches on mail in ballots that they found on petitions, since the security around both events are roughly the same, if they bothered to look for fraud on ballots. The difference is that they didn't look for fraud on the ballots, just the petitions. It's just as easy for dead people to vote as it is for them to sign petitions. Signatures are just as likely to be mismatched on ballots as they are on petitions.

If signature mismatches aren't in the 2% range, you should assume the signature match is not credible.

So basically you have an untested hypothesis, but - as usual - you are certain that you are correct without any supporting proof.

 

[CTG-Tiger]

So basically you have an untested hypothesis, but - as usual - you are certain that you are correct without any supporting proof.

The hypothesis was tested with the petition

 

[MUTiger91]

The hypothesis was tested with the petition

They are independent events for which you are asserting - again without proof - that they are equivalent. Why don't you just admit that your definition of a fraudulent vote is one that you don't like.

 

[CTG-Tiger]

They are independent events for which you are asserting - again without proof - that they are equivalent. Why don't you just admit that your definition of a fraudulent vote is one that you don't like.

I'd like to see the same level of validation done for all petitions and elections. In California, they apply different standards. Wouldn't you agree with this?

 

[MUTiger91]

I'd like to see the same level of validation done for all petitions and elections. In California, they apply different standards. Wouldn't you agree with this?

You are also assuming the standards are different.

Trump was telling people dead people were voting. He was asked repeatedly for lists of names and he did not produce them. In this case, it appears someone found actual evidence and something was done with that. We set objective standards for how we will conduct and verify our elections BEFORE elections take place. We do not let a disgruntled loser try to keep trying to change the process until they get a different result.

 

[CTG-Tiger]

You are also assuming the standards are different.

Trump was telling people dead people were voting. He was asked repeatedly for lists of names and he did not produce them. In this case, it appears someone found actual evidence and something was done with that. We set objective standards for how we will conduct and verify our elections BEFORE elections take place. We do not let a disgruntled loser try to keep trying to change the process until they get a different result.

If dead people are signing petitions then of course they are also voting

You guys threw out the dead people vote and it overturned the petition for recall