ADVERTISEMENT

Next year's team

amtthew

Letterman
Gold Member
Dec 1, 2014
602
949
66
Can we talk about what an insane black hole next year's team is as of right now?

We are returning one (1) good player from this year's team that went .500 in the SEC and earned a whole 9 seed.

We need at LEAST seven players who have either significantly improved from this year, or who aren't even on the roster yet. It's insane.

Who from this team improves enough to be a starter next year? Anyone?

How many freshman will be starting next year? How about in the (real) rotation? People seem to act like Durugordon is going to come in and instantly start and be good. Counting on this sounds insane to me, as he wasn't even a top 150(!!) player. Where on earth is this coming from, and is there any reason to believe it?

How many transfers will be starting next year? 4? Do we have a line on any transfers who would be good enough to start next year that Mizzou is in on (preferrably more than a "heard from" list)?

Anyone have examples of mediocre teams replacing everyone in a year and how that turned out (good or bad)? Particularly examples of this happening without a coaching change. (The fact we ARE in this situation without a coaching change is absolutely insane to me, and one of my biggest criticisms of Cuonzo. Seems almost impossible for a good coach to come into his fifth season with one impact player on his roster)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: bryan006
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Go Big.
Get Premium.

Join Rivals to access this premium section.

  • Say your piece in exclusive fan communities.
  • Unlock Premium news from the largest network of experts.
  • Dominate with stats, athlete data, Rivals250 rankings, and more.
Log in or subscribe today Go Back