That’s literally what the Democrat state AGs and local DAs ran on…That any of you people think Milley or Fauci committed crimes is beyond stupid. It’s just the kind of bullshit that you all ****ing fester that keeps your rage club together.
And the reason they go back to 2014 is because of statute of limitation.
What do you expect when an administration comes in saying they’re going to go after all kinds of people for shit that’s basically pumped up bullshit propaganda. You people are fascist hypocrites whose egos crumbled under the weight of a mask. You’re such pussies.
Stop talking sense.That’s literally what the Democrat state AGs and local DAs ran on…
Another question, statute of limitation for what?That any of you people think Milley or Fauci committed crimes is beyond stupid. It’s just the kind of bullshit that you all ****ing fester that keeps your rage club together.
And the reason they go back to 2014 is because of statute of limitation.
What do you expect when an administration comes in saying they’re going to go after all kinds of people for shit that’s basically pumped up bullshit propaganda. You people are fascist hypocrites whose egos crumbled under the weight of a mask. You’re such pussies.
I’m not defending them. I’m glad Biden’s gone. But be honest. The GOP Congress tried for years to find anything and they had far less (except Hunter) than anything against Trump.Now do the Biden family
Irrelevant other than you go back to the longest statute for any nonviolent crime. The pardons were all nonviolent crimes. With only a couple of exceptions (e.g., non-filing of tax returns means the time never starts) nothing is over 10 years. Only murder, rape, maybe a few other violent crimes are longer or have no limit.Another question, statute of limitation for what?
Touch your fingers if you have to, but 1/1/2014 is over 11 years ago.Irrelevant other than you go back to the longest statute for any nonviolent crime. The pardons were all nonviolent crimes. With only a couple of exceptions (e.g., non-filing of tax returns means the time never starts) nothing is over 10 years. Only murder, rape, maybe a few other violent crimes are longer or have no limit.
It’s funny how you think there is something in every little detail, instead of being thorough. It’s valid to ask the question, but you all prefer paranoia.
So? It’s called a cushion.Touch your fingers if you have to, but 1/1/2014 is over 11 years ago.
You just told his it goes back to 2014 because of the statute of limitations. Either you suck at counting, thinking or were told that and went along with it. Is there a cushion on statute of limitations? You’re the lawyer and I am but a simpleton. If there is no cushion on the statute of limitations, which you just told us is the reason why it goes back more than 11 years, why would it go back more than 11 years?So? It’s called a cushion.
Since you’re so inquisitive, stil being “asking questions guy” and actually do something. But we know you all prefer to just believe shit or look for the right wing talking points.
It's called it goes back to Ukraine. Burisma and Metabiota where the Covid gain of function all began even before moving to China.So? It’s called a cushion.
Since you’re so inquisitive, stil being “asking questions guy” and actually do something. But we know you all prefer to just believe shit or look for the right wing talking points.
The root problem we have is that a malignant narcissist believes he has been wronged and he has been talking for at least a year about revenge and retribution. @dreamlaw was right to ask about Fauci and Milley. Fauci's "crime" is that MAGAs don't like his handling of COVID. Milley's "crime" is that he told China that the US would maintain stability prior to the transition to Biden. Trump called that "treason" (projection much?).Now do the Biden family
If you ignore everything that’s happened for years, you make a hell of a point.The root problem we have is that a malignant narcissist believes he has been wronged and he has been talking for at least a year about revenge and retribution. @dreamlaw was right to ask about Fauci and Milley. Fauci's "crime" is that MAGAs don't like his handling of COVID. Milley's "crime" is that he told China that the US would maintain stability prior to the transition to Biden. Trump called that "treason" (projection much?).
Now if Trump is going to go after people simply because he could not control them, it seems reasonable that pardon power be used. I don't think the Biden family should be pardoned, but Trump is the one who gave them air cover by announcing his own lawless intent on the campaign trail. I don't think any POTUS should be able to pardon family, close business associates, campaign leadership or donors. I also don't think any POTUS should involve himself in decisions about criminal prosecutions - especially about the family of a former POTUS or political foes. That is why in the past the DoJ has been independent.
If you believe the misinformation spewed out for years, you make a heck of a rebuttal.If you ignore everything that’s happened for years, you make a hell of a point.
This very site that you pay $99 a year for is littered with proof that what you just posted is incorrect.If you believe the misinformation spewed out for years, you make a heck of a rebuttal.
This is a lot of words to just admit the jig is up and that the justice system is merely a political weapon for whoever is in power.The root problem we have is that a malignant narcissist believes he has been wronged and he has been talking for at least a year about revenge and retribution. @dreamlaw was right to ask about Fauci and Milley. Fauci's "crime" is that MAGAs don't like his handling of COVID. Milley's "crime" is that he told China that the US would maintain stability prior to the transition to Biden. Trump called that "treason" (projection much?).
Now if Trump is going to go after people simply because he could not control them, it seems reasonable that pardon power be used. I don't think the Biden family should be pardoned, but Trump is the one who gave them air cover by announcing his own lawless intent on the campaign trail. I don't think any POTUS should be able to pardon family, close business associates, campaign leadership or donors. I also don't think any POTUS should involve himself in decisions about criminal prosecutions - especially about the family of a former POTUS or political foes. That is why in the past the DoJ has been independent.
You mean your postings and citations of BS?This very site that you pay $99 a year for is littered with proof that what you just posted is incorrect.
That’s not good for anyone.This is a lot of words to just admit the jig is up and that the justice system is merely a political weapon for whoever is in power.
If you truly think the justice system is functional enough to withstand this then do what the left does for asylum seekers. Set up a defense fund and team of legal minds and see those charged through the prosecutions to expose them for the farce that they are.That’s not good for anyone.
Should Liz Cheney be prosecuted for investigating 1/6? That’s basically the BS proposed.
No. That’s not a crime. Should she be pardoned for investigating 1/6?That’s not good for anyone.
Should Liz Cheney be prosecuted for investigating 1/6? That’s basically the BS proposed.
Normally I would, but I know the smell of pure political harassment too. Although I would have enjoyed the Trump meltdown when Cheney is exonerated.If you truly think the justice system is functional enough to withstand this then do what the left does for asylum seekers. Set up a defense fund and team of legal minds and see those charged through the prosecutions to expose them for the farce that they are.
But if we're not going to bother with reassuring everyone that the justice system is working fine then I think we're cooked.Normally I would, but I know the smell of pure political harassment too.
"Litter" is an accurate description. "Proof" is not.This very site that you pay $99 a year for is littered with proof that what you just posted is incorrect.
It can't possibly be working fine when somebody attempts to overturn an election and never faces trial. He was able to obstruct investigations with privilege claims and then force his case to SCOTUS before trial with other privilege claims that he pretty much invented. He repeatedly proclaimed his intention for retribution. He even tried to put Matt effing Gaetz in the lead role in the DoJ. None of that sounds sane, much less working fine.I appreciate you engaging with me on this.
But if we're not going to bother with reassuring everyone that the justice system is working fine then I think we're cooked.
Why would I not engage with you?I appreciate you engaging with me on this.
But if we're not going to bother with reassuring everyone that the justice system is working fine then I think we're cooked.
You seem a little too hopeful. Are you waiting for one of those pardons?This is great. Trump is going to make new positions and grant full immunity to those to do what needs to be done. Elections have consequences and actions set precedent. Trump can do as he pleases and there is no fear of repercussions. Trump will give out pardons to any and everyone who has ever voted R
Carte blanche time bayaaaay! Biden's last days has ensured Trump can and will do as he pleases and I'm here for itYou seem a little too hopeful. Are you waiting for one of those pardons?
Interesting this question got overlooked by Dreamy.No. That’s not a crime. Should she be pardoned for investigating 1/6?
They fvcking hate when I start asking questions.Interesting this question got overlooked by Dreamy.
The fun part will be seeing the difference in coverage when it is done by RepublicansThis is the problem with US politics in a nutshell. Now is standard operating procedure because one side did it.