ADVERTISEMENT

A "similar" case

TitoNW

Retired Number
Gold Member
Jan 31, 2017
6,962
10,866
41
A better comp than UNC, etc. is Donnie Tyndall case at Southern Miss, since it involved the same thing - players/recruits not doing their own work.

Like MU, it was categorized as "Level 1 - Standard" (not "Mitigating"). And they did get slightly harsher penalties (2 year postseason ban, etc) while Mizzou's are the lowest for Level 1 - Standard.

But a few big differences in that case ...

1. The work was done by assistant coaches & grad assistants

2. They did it at the direction of the Head Coach

3. They also gave $$ & prepaid credit cards to HS coaches (to give to players)

4. They didn't "self report"

Oh, and ...

5. The H
ead Coach tried to obstruct the investigation - deleted emails, communicated with those involved on burner phone and had Asst Coach instruct a player to flat out lie the morning before he met with NCAA.

Tyndall & a couple assistants got "show cause". And again, penalties were SLIGHTLY harsher (mid range vs low).

But it was categorized as the same level of infractions "Level 1 - Standard" which comes with a fixed range of penalties.

Even if we got the low end of those penalties - the fact that its grouped with Tyndall/Southern Miss - where the staff itself was driving the fraud, plus handed out cash, and tried to cover it up ...

... is ABSOLUTELY F*CKING INSANE!!!

https://www.cbssports.com/college-b...huge-ncaa-violations-of-former-so-miss-coach/
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Go Big.
Get Premium.

Join Rivals to access this premium section.

  • Say your piece in exclusive fan communities.
  • Unlock Premium news from the largest network of experts.
  • Dominate with stats, athlete data, Rivals250 rankings, and more.
Log in or subscribe today Go Back