ADVERTISEMENT

A tale of two nominees

Will_L

Hall of Famer
Gold Member
Oct 12, 2003
19,606
21,425
66
The difference in how the “legacy” media covers the nominees for Supreme Court Justice appointments is telling. They are slobbering all over themselves in praise for Jackson. They were quite the opposite for Barrett. If you recall during Kavanaugh they saw nothing wrong with a phony dog and pony show of the vilest form where Dems drug up some mentally disturbed people claiming they might have been raped in a drunken orgy sometime, somewhere 40 years ago, but her closest friend said did not happen . They went along straight faced as the Dems tried to object before opening the confirmation hearing, shouting and whining. Remember the Spartacus Moment . Klobachar insinuating he was a drunk? Harris now VP making a total ass out of herself acting like she had some huge gotcha, when she was just blabbering.

So this morning on Scarborough he says. “Well Senator Coons, the republicans said they would not go into the gutter. And immediately they went right there seemingly saying she is soft on crime” …

The nominee went under the sentencing guidelines repeatedly on child porn sellers. She was against requiring registering of sex offenders when they move into a community. That seems lenient and should in no way be called “in the gutter” to question at a hearing.

This example of how the media caters to the Dems, show just what an utter disaster Biden has been. He has totally lost independents and a good many democrats leaving him at 40 % approval. That is in spite of a radical left tilt to benefit him by all the mainstream media. You put lipstick on a pig, you get Biden.

 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Go Big.
Get Premium.

Join Rivals to access this premium section.

  • Say your piece in exclusive fan communities.
  • Unlock Premium news from the largest network of experts.
  • Dominate with stats, athlete data, Rivals250 rankings, and more.
Log in or subscribe today Go Back