I mean, it seemed rather obvious to me. It seemed even MORE obvious that it should not have been overturned, what with the standard for reversal and such.
But with the benefit of replay, how can officials fvck things up like this in game changing scenarios?
If you're going to have replay and take time away from the drama and theatrics that is the sport, can they at least not reverse calls to the WRONG ruling?
I don't think there was anything nefarious going on, and I had no dog in the hunt, but still. The officials in all likelihood changed the outcome of a high stakes game.
