Folks these folks are delusional. They HATE us. Read their junk. There is no more satisfying MIZZOU win in the SEC than these jokers. Believe me...I live here.
__________________________
Post is about our probation.
__________________________
Post is about our probation.
- NOTE: NUMBERS UPDATED>>BRAIN CRAMP LAST NIGHT.
So, I was curious and went to the NCAA site for Appeals and looked at their reported results (yeah slow day). They showed 30 results of appeals in the Div 1. 87% of results were upheld. 13% "sent back to Committee on Infractions for Review". Of the 13% sent back all of them involved recruiting restrictions or coaches being given show cause penalties. None involved post season bans. The only post season ban I saw was upheld. Mizzo infractions involved academic fraud essentially. Tutors doing tests or work for players to keep the playing with testimony that is was "normal" or "pressured" process. Important observation there was no finding of "lack of institutional control".
Why is this important? Right now, not at all. In a few weeks. Might mean a whole lot! Or might mean nothing at all...depending on how we perform. We are the SEC...get caught....do your time like a man. I just got tired of hearing the cheaters from Mizzo whining about the penalty. I think they should be stand-up take the shot and move on. Nothing worse that cheaters - than whining cheaters!
1 colalex, Tuesday at 8:23 PM
Last edited: Yesterday at 7:19 AM
Report
Like + Quote Reply
vogtne, OcularPatDown, jarvisgiles1 and 7 others like this.
harrystaxMember
Gold Member
Joined:
Aug 30, 2018
Messages:
33
Likes Received:
137
NewGood research; definitely interesting to know regardless of what the season holds!
2 harrystax, Tuesday at 8:31 PM
Report
Like + Quote Reply
Black Magic '93Well-Known Member
Gold Member
Joined:
Jun 20, 2005
Messages:
2,736
Likes Received:
3,862
New
↑
So, I was curious and went to the NCAA site for Appeals and looked at their reported results (yeah slow day). They showed 10 results of appeals in the Div 1. 60% of results were upheld. 40% "sent back to Committee on Infractions for Review". Of the 40% sent back all of them involved recruiting restrictions or coaches being given show cause penalties. None involved post season bans. The only post season ban I saw was upheld. Mizzo infractions involved academic fraud essentially. Tutors doing tests or work for players to keep the playing with testimony that is was "normal" or "pressured" process. Important observation there was no finding of "lack of institutional control".
Why is this important? Right now, not at all. In a few weeks. Might mean a whole lot! Or might mean nothing at all...depending on how we perform. We are the SEC...get caught....do your time like a man. I just got tired of hearing the cheaters from Mizzo whining about the penalty. I think they should be stand-up take the shot and move on. Nothing worse that cheaters - than whining cheaters!
Click to expand...
I hope they come back and give them another year bowl ban tacked onto the 2019 one.
3 Black Magic '93, Tuesday at 8:50 PM
Report
Like + Quote Reply
SterlthePearl, Lakecock1 and kmo72003 like this.
colalexActive Member
Gold Member
Joined:
Nov 19, 2006
Messages:
2,042
Likes Received:
1,629
New
↑
I hope they come back and give them another year bowl ban tacked onto the 2019 one.
Lol...thought the same thing. Whine, bitch, moan - lose? Sure here is another year.