ADVERTISEMENT

BASKETBALL RECRUITING Mizzou offers 2025 forward A'mare Bynum

Login to view embedded media Login to view embedded media Login to view embedded media
Dennis Gates offered Bynum while visiting Link Academy today. Bynum played with Aaron Rowe on MOKAN during the EYBL circuit this year, he averaged 11.7 points, 5.9 rebounds and 1.1 assists per game. Bynum holds a ton of offers has taken visits to Colorado, Iowa, Iowa State (unofficial) and Nebraska and has others set up with LSU, Ohio State and Xavier. Originally from Omaha, Neb.

OFF TOPIC SIAP Fans going to be picking up more of the NIL tab

in ticket prices at least at Tennessee.


As reported by ESPN, the University of Tennessee, as part of its future plans for revenue-sharing with players in 2025, will tack a 10 percent "Talent Fee" onto the ticket prices. The university announced this in an email to football season-ticket holders this week, complete with a video from athletic director Danny White, in which he describes the new fee as "part of an extensive plan to continue our dominance in college athletics and build something like never seen before."

The 10 percent fee applies to both season tickets and single game tickets, but along with that, the university plans to add an average increase of 4.5 percent on all football ticket prices. And they point to NIL as being responsible for the markup:

"In this era of name, image and likeness (NIL), there has never been as close a connection between resources and competitive success. We want to be a leader in college sports. That means we want to be a leader in revenue sharing."
Danny White

With this comes the first domino in how universities plan to pass the buck onto their fanbase and taxpayers. Never mind the fact that in 2023, the football program specifically netted the school $134.9 million in revenue and $75 million in profit. This trend will allow for schools to try and maximize their own profits, even as athletes eat into their pie.

Believe Vandy had a good idea

what we were doing offensively at all times. I believe this is the reason we were hesitant, why Brady looked slow on those designed runs, the 3rd-and-1s were stuffed, etc.

Even on Noel’s 66-yarder, they had a good call: they brought a safety up on a run blitz but he plugged the same gap as a teammate, leaving Nate the hole he chose.

Did we have a single wide open receiver? Not that I saw on TV (maybe Burden’s first TD). Even when it appeared Brady missed an open Burden for a TD, Stinch pointed out on replay that the safety stayed home in centerfield until Brady threw left.

Hats off to Vandy, but whoa, need to make some adjustments here.

An honest assessment of Cook and the offense after rewatch

Couldn’t watch the game yesterday, so watched a replay today specifically looking at Cook and the offense after seeing so much negativity yesterday. With that said, here are some MatyMaukApologist opinions (some of which have been said and some I don’t think have).

On Cook:

-Cook made very few legitimately bad throws all night. I counted three, one early in the first half where he airmailed a wide open Wease and two where he didn’t catch the DE dropping back into coverage and the throws were batted down (one should’ve been picked).

-Many of his incompletions downfield were not perfect throws, but catchable balls thrown into tight windows. LB3 got turned around on one over his head that should’ve been caught. Many others were pretty good placement considering the coverage and he put it only where his receivers could get it.

-He was generally very good when plays broke down. Hit his check downs a handful of times, escaped the pocket and avoided sacks throughout the night, and when nobody was open he would intentionally throw the ball at a receivers feet or slightly OB to avoid an INT or intentional grounding call. Very good job avoiding sacks, penalties or turnovers - definitely an underrated trait.

On general gameplay:

-Run design needs to be entirely re-tooled. Noel is quick and good at hitting holes which covers up a lot of missed opportunities. Run plays are often telegraphed with no misdirection. The entire line will push one way, and the ball always ends up going that way. Further, there are almost never any option plays where Cook has the option to keep, which is a huge mistake considering his mobility (either that or he just never thinks to keep it). I counted one time where he kept the ball on an option play and he slipped trying to get around the tackles but otherwise would’ve had some yards. The defense is able to sell out on handoffs and linebackers cheat up every time. This burned the offense on a couple third and shorts, and I think contributes to the inability to finish drives in the red zone with touchdowns. This will only get worse deeper in SEC play.

-Further, designed QB runs are uninspiring. I counted two or three QB draws with an empty backfield - why not keep an RB on Cook’s side to create a potential threat of Cook pitching or at least add a blocker? Every time there was a QB draw Vandy’s defense sold out on Cook and ate it up.

-Going back to third and short, does Moore even have a playbook for going under center? Handoffs from the shotgun are easy for the defense to track and, going back to the lack of creativity in play design, make it very easy for the defense to sell out on the run. Also, every time Carroll comes into the game in these situations it’s obvious it’s going to be a handoff inside,

-Offense did a good job limiting penalties. There was an illegal formation called on a very late snap in the first drive, but otherwise was pretty disciplined.

-Special teams had a few unforced errors. Craig’s kicking woes are already well documented but a couple other silly mistakes cost Mizzou field position. Speedy completely mishandled a kickoff so that drive started on Mizzou’s two yard line. LB3 had one or two good punt returns get called back as well - albeit one of them was a questionable block in the back called on Roberts.

STP or STL ??

This team, including the coaching staff needs to get back to playing and coaching like they have have Something to Prove instead of playing like they have Something to Lose. They just beat a good Top 25 ACC team and a much improved SEC team and dropped 6 spots in the AP Poll. Use that as motivation to get back to the mindset it's them against the World, bcuz it looks like the pollsters can't wait for Mizzou to lose a game and drop them so far down in the polls they'll never climb back in the Top 12 and a playoff game. Play for the W and each other and don't worry about personal stats. Put that foot on the gas pedal and don't take it off.
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT