ADVERTISEMENT

FOOTBALL Outside zone play didn't really work well this past season.

Good read from RockMNation:



Also known as “Drink’s Binky”, this play has been a staple of the Drinkwitz offense since his days at Arkansas State, and one that Larry Rountree III and Tyler Badie ran to perfection. The 2022 guys? Not so much. But you can see the appeal; the offensive line blocks in a direction rather than a specific guy, and the running back flows behind that movement to the outside boundary until he finds open space (or a hole) and hits it for big yards. And, as you can see in this design, you can also add an RPO wrinkle and have the quarterback keep it and/or throw it the receiver on the opposite side of the movement (although Drink doesn’t do that enough). The thing to remember with this play is that, in previous years, this was a good play to generate explosive yards. In 2022 though? Eh...

Number of times this play was called: 119

Percentage of all plays called: 13.5%

Total yards gained: 555

Percentage of total yards gained: 11.6%

Yards per play: 4.7

Success rate: 28.5%

Yuck. Yuck yuck yuck. When your staple plays gets called 119 times but only manages a 28% success rate you’re just being lazy. And while it did gain the most yardage on the year...it was the second-most called play, of course it gained a ton of yardage! You’ll remember the games where freshman lineman Armand Membou would don the number 9 and lineup as a tight end/6th offensive lineman? This play was the reason why, to help beef up the outside blocking on Eli’s favorite toy. I would argue that the inefficiency of this play is one of the biggest reasons why the offense fell backward this year; whether you want to blame the line or the backs, it doesn’t matter, Drink’s go-to play stunk and he never really got over it.

BASKETBALL MY POST-GAME THOUGHTS ON THE WIN OVER OLE MISS

@drewking0222 is on the ground and will have full postgame coverage for you guys from Oxford. While he does interviews, here are my thoughts on this one:


*We spend so much time breaking these games down and it’s really as simple as this: Shoot 32% from the floor and 10% from three (that’s what Mizzou did on Saturday) you’re not beating anybody. Shoot 55.4% from the floor and 53% from three (like Mizzou did tonight) and you’re beating virtually everybody. The shots went in. We’re going to get into it deeper and obviously it’s a little more complicated than that. But not a lot.

*There are a lot of things to like about this game and I’ll get to those. But let’s talk about two things not to love. Because this game was still in doubt with three minutes left despite the fact Mizzou was shooting 53% from the floor and had made 16 threes:


*Defense. Look, when it seems like everyone is shooting lights out against you, that’s a you thing. Missouri is so aggressive chasing the ball there are a lot of times they simply can’t recover and get to shooters. At times it appears to me Missouri is just content that if you can make a 21 footer, so be it. The bad news is, a lot of guys can make a 21 footer. They play a gambling defense. Sometimes it works incredibly well. When the other team takes care of the ball it leads to a whole lot of wide open jump shots. There was a graphic the other day that showed Missouri is the streakiest team in the country (judging by 10-0 or better runs both for and against). The defense is a part of that. They’re never out of a game, but neither is the other team. For the record, Ole Miss was 9-27 from three tonight. It sure seemed like it was a lot better.

*Rebounding. I get that they’re not big. But that doesn’t explain it. I don’t really know how to explain it. But they are terrible at rebounding. I’d have to go back and watch a bunch of film to know if it’s boxouts, positioning, effort or what. But it’s not simply height. Yes, that’s a factor. There’s no way that’s all of it. Ole Miss had 16 offensive rebounds for 18 second chance points. That's why this was a game for as long as it was.

*Okay, now for the good. Mo Diarra and Isiaih Mosley were, for different reasons, non-factors for the first two months of the season. Now they’re legit difference makers. A lot of people knew Mosley had this in him. I’m not sure any of us knew Diarra did. Both situations speak to coaching. That’s impressive. Bringing guys along at the pace YOU think they should go, not the pace WE think they should go. And it appears to have worked pretty well in both cases. Related, I would like to apologize for believing at one time that this team might not need Isiaih Mosley because it was already good on offense. You were right, I was wrong. You are smart, I am stupid. You are good-looking, I am unattractive.

*I will not bury anyone on this roster, because of that paragraph I just typed. Noah Carter is slumping right now. But there will be a time he’ll help for sure. DeAndre Gholston had a really bad night tonight, but Dennis Gates recognized it and sat him in the second half. Aidan Shaw is seeing his playing time dip mostly because right now he's an offensive liability. I know he made a couple of threes against Alabama and that's good. But he's limited on that end. The point is, this is not a perfect team. There are flaws. There are guys you watch and think they can’t see the floor, but the next time out, they might be the reason Missouri wins a game. Again, that’s coaching. Gates is even-keeled. He isn’t overreacting to every single development the way we are. That pays off in the long run.

*Good to see D’Moi Hodge have the ball go in again. He had made four of his previous 25 threes. He made five tonight alone. More than any single factor, I think his shooting ignites this team.

*You saw tonight why Kobe Brown didn’t play Saturday. You don’t risk his health when he’s at less than 100% in a game that was always going to be very tough to win. You save him for a game (or stretch of games) you’re much more likely to need him. I have no inside info here, but my guess is if he’d really had to, Kobe could have played Saturday. But Gates made the right call long term for the team.

*Hodge, Mosley and Brown combined to score 62 points on 40 field goal attempts. That's insane.

*I think Missouri’s best five is Mosley, Diarra, Nick Honor, Kobe and Hodge. I think that’s the lineup you’ll see on the floor in crunch time more often than not. Not all the time. There will be some nights there’s a different hot hand or a matchup that dictates something different. But right now, I think that’s the best five Gates can put on the floor.

*This was one Missouri needed to win. The path to the tournament involves two or three road wins in the league. They got one. Now you’re home for Iowa State in a game that would be a monstrous home win (the Cyclones are top ten in the country). Losing that game doesn’t kill you. There’s more upside than downside. Then you get LSU at home and those Tigers are pretty terrible. And you go to Mississippi State and that’s winnable. Then you get South Carolina at home and they're awful too. Two weeks from now, I think there’s a decent chance we’re talking about Mizzou on the verge of lock status.

Screen Shot 2023-01-24 at 7.59.13 PM.png

Screen Shot 2023-01-24 at 8.18.51 PM.png

FOOTBALL Best High School Football Programs in each State...

GUESS WHO was picked for Missouri?

City: Webb City
Type of school: Public
Record since 2009: 152-9 (.944 winning percentage)
State championships: 14 (1989, 1992, 1993, 1997, 2000, 2001, 2006, 2008, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2016)
Notable players: OL Hugh Sprinkle (1914), DE Grant Wistrom (1994), QB Collin Howard (2007), QB John Roderique (2013)
Notable coaches: Jerry Kill (1988-90), Kurt Thompson (1990-96), John Roderique (1997-present)

FULL ARTICLE: https://www.stadiumtalk.com/s/best-...rams-by-state-50cbef311f634728?utm_source=msn

Interesting to me is that the pick for some states on the list were schools that have fallen on hard times recently...most notably our neighbors to the south:
ARKANSAS
City:
Little Rock
Type of school: Public
Record since 2009: 40-68-1 (.366 winning percentage)
  • Like
Reactions: Mizzou Mule

BASKETBALL Snow Day Mizzou Transition research

We have a snow day today so I’ve had some thoughts while watching games and this morning I looked a little deeper into it.

I know different stats track turnovers and points off turnovers, but I think there’s a bit deeper meaning behind some of it.

A live ball turnover hurts much worse than a travel, double dribble, carry, etc because you can set your defense after those.

So I went back and looked at last night.
What I used was a live ball turnover where the opposition got a shot off within 10 seconds of a live ball turnover. Very interesting.

Ole miss turnovers
1st half
17:29 Ruffin TO, Mosley steal, Mosley made layup
17:23 Burns TO, Mosley steal, Mosley missed layup
9:57 White TO, East Steal, East made 3 FT’s
9:05 Caldwell TO, East Steal, East made layup
6:28 McKinnis TO, Honor Steal, Honor TO
2nd half
16:31 Burns TO, Kobe Steal, Mosley made Layup
16:24 Caldwell TO, Hodge Steal, Hodge missed layup
9:30 Fagan TO, Kaleb steal, Hodge made 3

8 steals that lead to quick transition action
12 points
2 missed layups
1 turnover


Ole Miss on the hand off Mizzou’s turnovers
1st half 7:39 Gholston TO, Ruffin steal, Fagan layup
2nd half 16:59 Kobe TO, Burns steal, Caldwell missed 3
2 steals that lead to quick transition action
2 points
1 missed 3

I think this is what makes Mizzou’s defense different. Yes, I want to pull my hair out and yell that we’re out of position on close outs, and leaving people open, etc

But we absolutely DOMINATE the transition game. Yes there were more live ball turnovers that I didn’t include, but that is because a shot went up 15 seconds or later after the turnover which means we or they got back and got set and made the ball move and it was more a half court set than transition.

So in live hall turnovers last night we were plus 10. I think it’s incredible we only had 2 turnovers that lead to them getting a transition look, yet we had 8 such chances.

To some this may mean a lot of nothing.. but I think this is where Mizzou separates itself and why the bad defensive rotations and close outs happen sometimes too.. there’s a give and take. It’s arguable that this plus 10 isn’t worth the trade off of giving up open 3’s and being out of position to defensive rebound however.

Tiger baseball coach Steve Bieser continues hot stove talk with KC Tigers

Last week it was JJ Picollo of the Royals. This week, Mizzou baseball coach Steve Bieser stoked the baseball fires with his visit to the Tiger Club of KC. (Mentions Sam Horn a little in the clip below.)

First pitch for the baseball Tigers will be Feb. 17 at Globe Life Field in Arlington, TX against Oklahoma State. The spring slate includes a March 22 game at Kauffman Stadium against kansas.

Our Club meets each Tuesday of the school year at Westport Flea Market Bar & Grill. Our January 31 guest will be Jeff Passan, ESPN MLB columnist.

Login to view embedded media

  • Poll
Next 11 Games

What do you expect our record to be over the next 11 games?

  • 2-9

    Votes: 5 2.1%
  • 3-8

    Votes: 25 10.5%
  • 4-7

    Votes: 111 46.8%
  • 5-6

    Votes: 96 40.5%

KenPom has us projected to go 2-9 over our next 11:
kU
UCF (in FL)
Illinois
UK
@Arkansas
Vanderbilt
@A&M
@Florida
Arkansas
Alabama
@Ole Miss

It certainly is going to be a gauntlet. Would love to know where people’s expectations are.
  • Like
Reactions: Borderwartiger

BASKETBALL QUICK THOUGHTS ON MIZZOU'S 89-77 WIN OVER OLE MISS

-Some more good minutes from Mo Diarra. There was a stretch where he got a steal, made a 3-pointer on the next possession, then grabbed an offensive rebound and laid the ball in on the next trip down. He's a difference maker, for sure. I wouldn't be surprised to see him in the starting lineup soon.

-Some y'all asked what the rotation was going to look like once everybody was all the way back. We got a close look at it tonight. Obviously Tre was out tonight and I do think he'll still play double-digit minutes (he might even keep his starting spot) because of how much they value him, especially defensively. But Ronnie DeGray didn't play at all. I don't know that we'll see him start another game.

-The defense was pretty rough. Mizzou should've won by a lot more than it did considering how many 3s they were knocking down. They just seemed a lot less physical than they normally are. Like I said at halftime, it reminded me a lot of the Vanderbilt game. A big difference this time, though, was that it didn't have that much of an impact at the free throw line. Maybe Tre could've set a better tone if he was healthy.

-On the other hand, the shots are falling again. They really went from 2-28 from deep on Saturday to 16-30 tonight. It's night and day.

-Kaleb Brown got in the game for the first time since Nov. 26. I don't think he would've played if Tre was healthy or if Mosley hadn't picked up his 4th foul or if Gholston hadn't played poorly. He did pick up a steal and an assist, though.

-Gates has said all along, winning on the road is hard. Mizzou got the job done tonight. They've got a really tough opponent up next, but it'll be at home, at least. Halfway through the SEC schedule, I think Mizzou is close to where it's supposed to be.
Screenshot_20230124_075819.png

BASKETBALL Brown and Mosley Duo

The long-anticipated return of the Isiaih Mosley has come! With him back Mosley and Brown could potentially be one of the best in-and-out duos in the country. I think for this team to go far in March both of these players are going to need to be big contributors, as they are the two more consistent and efficient players on the team. Both of them will need to play 30+ minutes and both get at least 15 shots a game. Let me know your thoughts.
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT